Thailand is in temporary limbo. The current government, which came to office in May 2014 via the country’s 12th military coup, is in full election mode. The Thai people wait in uncertainty for the outcome.
Many major economic decisions, both private and public, remain on hold also. Even the government’s highly prized Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) is under a cloud, the winning bidder for the high speed train linking Bangkok’s two airports and U-Tapao in Rayong wanting to change the conditions after winning the tender.
Thailand’s economy is the eighth largest in Asia and the second largest in Southeast Asia (SEA), after Indonesia.
During 2018, the Thai economy grew moderately at just under 4 per cent in real terms, about the same as in 2017, and GDP per capita reached just under $7,000.
The Thai economy is heavily export-dependent, with gross exports accounting for two-thirds of GDP. Economic performance is thus dependent on global economic activity, especially in the major markets of China, Japan, the United States and Europe.
Exports are dominated by manufactured goods such as electronics, vehicles, machinery and foodstuffs.
Political stability post-election not guaranteed
Private investment, the most volatile component of aggregate demand, is driven by business expectations regarding domestic stability and export demand. Both remain highly uncertain.
The upcoming election could produce a stable political outcome, restoring business confidence and promoting growth, but it could also bring a return to the political turmoil of the pre-coup decade.
Bans on political activity and restrictions on media freedom were instituted by the military government following the 2014 coup. These bans are only now being relaxed. The lack of open political discussion during the tenure of the military government has contributed to the uncertainty about Thailand’s future.
Export demand is threatened by global events over which Thailand has no control. The possibility of an escalating US–China trade war is especially concerning, because Thailand’s manufactured exports are enmeshed in complex production networks that involve both China and the United States.
The country’s short-term economic prospects are sufficiently worrying that private investment remains at around a quarter of GDP, not enough to raise growth above 4 per cent.
Thailand’s long-term future
At the same time, Thailand’s long-term future depends on factors that are very much within its control. Although the coup leaders promised to ‘restore happiness’ to the Thai people, the junta’s reform agenda does little to address the country’s long-term economic problem — the archaic and ineffective Thailand public education system.
For decades, successive Thai governments of all persuasions have attempted to reform the Thailand education system. But these attempts have been successfully blocked by the Ministry of Education (MoE) and teachers’ unions.
The result is poor standards of literacy and numeracy among young Thai people, leaving them ill-equipped to provide the skilled workforce that an industrialising economy requires.
Consider Thailand’s manufacturing export industries and in particular the automotive industry. Exports of both vehicles and automotive parts have grown impressively. But the automotive industry is largely foreign-owned, especially in the final assembly stage, which consists almost entirely of Japanese firms. All design and major managerial decisions occur in Japan.
According to the manufacturers, their main difficulty in upgrading their activities within Thailand is the lack of an educated workforce that can readily be trained to a high level of skill.
Education… for those who can afford it
The proliferation of private schools is another manifestation of education failure. For middle-class Thais who can afford them, private schools provide an escape from the failures of the public school system.
Private schooling is a thriving business. One such school, a Singapore-based for-profit enterprise, was recently listed on the Thai stock exchange — the first such listing for a private school.
This is perfectly legal in Thailand, but it is not the solution to the country’s education problems because so few Thais can afford to attend.
For most Thais, the result of an inadequate public education is a lifetime of unskilled or semi-skilled employment, dooming them to the lower rungs of the economic ladder.
For the country, the result is the much-quoted but little-understood ‘middle-income trap’.
The experience of many developing countries, including Thailand, is that a development strategy relying on cheap labour and a business-friendly economic environment has elevated them to middle-income levels, virtually eliminating mass poverty in the process.
These are commendable achievements. The economic growth that underlies them is based on private investment in physical capital, supported by an efficient financial system and public investment in complementary physical infrastructure such as roads, ports, electricity supplies and law enforcement. But this process cannot get countries from middle-income to high-income levels.
Improving human capital a government role
Typically, as a country reaches middle-income levels, growth rates steadily decline as low productivity labour is absorbed.
Upgrading beyond cheap-labour manufacturing and services requires upgrading skills, which in turn requires massive investment in human capital. The private financial system cannot finance that form of investment because unlike investment in physical capital, investment in human capital does not produce an asset that can be used as legal collateral.
The tenure of the military government could have been used as an opportunity to address this fundamental development problem. Tragically, education reform was ignored. It remains to be seen whether the restoration of democracy can produce a better outcome.
This article was written by Peter Warr, John Crawford Professor of Agricultural Economics Emeritus, the Australian National University (ANU). It first appeared on East Asia Forum under a Creative Commons License and is reproduced here with its permission.
Feature photo ©Shane Curzon
Related:
- Thailand TNE potential “strong”, as country bids to become education hub (The Pie News)
- Could Thailand become the next big higher-education powerhouse? (Asian Correspondent)
- THAI ELECTIONS: PEOPLE WANT A FAIR VOTE AND ‘REAL PM’, BUT WILL THEY GET THEM? (SCMP)
- Pearson signs MoU with Thailand’s EEC (The Pie News)
Overlooked for four years, Thailand’s education system awaits election result added by East Asia Forum on
View all posts by East Asia Forum →
East Asia Forum
It consists of an online publication and a quarterly magazine, East Asia Forum Quarterly, which aim to provide clear and original analysis from the leading minds in the region and beyond.
Latest posts by East Asia Forum (see all)
- China’s South China Sea bullying seeing increased blowback from Asean claimants – February 2, 2022
- Illusionary, delusionary or visionary? Cambodia tests living with COVID-19 – December 6, 2021
- Prioritising a Philippine–EU FTA is vital for post-pandemic recovery – July 26, 2020
- Time for Asean to stand up for itself in the South China Sea – July 25, 2020